4 ms·
The industry sells the devices as "intelligent" which brings the expectation of maturity and wisdom-- dependability. So the analogy is more like a cabin door o
by _wire_ 1y ago
The industry sells the devices as "intelligent" which brings the expectation of maturity and wisdom-- dependability.
So the analogy is more like a cabin door on a 737. Some yahoo could try to open it in flight, but that doesn't justify it spontaneously blowing out at altitude.
But the elephant in the room is why are we persevering over these silly dichotomies? If you've got a problem with an AI, why not just ask the AI? Can't it clean up after making a poopy?!
- gchamonlive 1y agoYeah and that's a problem for the industry. At most it's exposing a problem in society. These companies are not interested in smart LLMs. They are interested in smart LLMs just as long as they make them obscenely rich. For the regular user it's just a matter of changing the prompt to get a better output using a capable model. So it's a matter of education. Of course model bias takes a role. If you train a model on racist posts you'll get a racist model. But as long as you have a fairly capable model for the average use, these edge cases aren't of interest for the user who can just adjust their prompts.