> This smells a bit strange to me, it's a "for-profit" company.. Fair use is a bit of pipe-dream here. I think you're conflating "fair use" with "non-profit",

> This smells a bit strange to me, it's a "for-profit" company.. Fair use is a bit of pipe-dream here. I think you're conflating "fair use" with "non-profit", or at least nudging that direction. That's too simplistic. Fair use is a four-factor test, and profitability is not among the four.