7 ms·
I'm going to throw out my own ignorant theory. AIs that I find useful are still just LLMs and LLMs power comes from having a massive amount of text to work wit
by duxup 1y ago
I'm going to throw out my own ignorant theory.
AIs that I find useful are still just LLMs and LLMs power comes from having a massive amount of text to work with to string together word math and come up with something ok. That's a lot of data that comes together to get things ... kinda right... sometimes.
I don't think there's that data set for "use an app" yet.
We've seen from "AI plays games" efforts that there have been some pretty spectacular failures. It seems like "use app" is a different problem.
- cheevly 1y agoLLMs have literally won Pokemon. Im pretty sure that using an app is 10x simpler.
- Vilian 1y agoA lot simpler to run pokemon than test an app, the game play by itself sometimes
- diggan 1y ago> A lot simpler to run pokemon than test an app Yes and no, I'd say. On one hand, apps tend to be used by even the most dumb person (they are "users" after all ;) ) and I'm sure there are more people out there who can use most apps enough than people who can beat Pokemon, even if one might generally be easier than the other. It's kind of hard to judge though I guess, I played Pokemon (Red) last time when it launched in my country and I was like 8 or something, maybe I underestimate the average person but I feel like I overestimate people generally.