3 ms·
Sorry, meant Phil Schiller, the only one to question whether a 27% commission is wise. > Prior to the June 20 meeting, there were individuals within Apple who
by akmarinov 1y ago
Sorry, meant Phil Schiller, the only one to question whether a 27% commission is wise.
> Prior to the June 20 meeting, there were individuals within Apple who were advocating for a commission, and others advocating for no commission. Those advocating for a commission included Mr. Maestri and Mr. Roman. Mr. Schiller disagreed. In an email, Mr. Schiller relayed that, with respect to the proposal for “a 27% commission for 24 hours,” “I have already explained my many issues with the commission concept,” and that “clearly I am not on team commission/fee.” Mr. Schiller testified that, at the time, he “had a question of whether we would be able to charge a commission” under the Injunction, a concern which he communicated.
- lapcat 1y agoSchiller is now a semi-retired "Apple Fellow", so it seems unlikely that he would be the next CEO. Not to mention that Steve Jobs could have but didn't select Schiller as his successor.