3 ms·
> This is the entire point of NATO, complete interoperability between forces. How is it interoperable if you cannot refuel your own planes ? Sounds like the op
by lm28469 1y ago
> This is the entire point of NATO, complete interoperability between forces.
How is it interoperable if you cannot refuel your own planes ? Sounds like the opposite of interoperability to me
- bilekas 1y agoThis is a problem of RAF, they're at fault for not getting their hardware in order, everyone else can do it fine. > Since the RAF's Voyager fleet lacks the boom-type system required by the F-35A Because 1 component is incompetent doesn't change the point of NATO integration. This came up with Isreali Jets too, the RAF have known about this but seem to be doing nothing. > https://afwerxchallenge.com/media/download/303d097876348381d7db57cd07166d01 https://afwerxchallenge.com/media/download/303d097876348381d... > https://www.difesa.it/assets/allegati/58377/allegato1annesso1requisitotecnicooperativotanker.pdf https://www.difesa.it/assets/allegati/58377/allegato1annesso... Section : 3.4.5. Fuel delivery methods These standards are implemented elsewhere in NATO. Infact the RAF might be the ONLY ones not capable. Edit for clarity on missing boom fuel syste,.