3 ms·
You are missing the malicious intent. Maybe I simply claim that whatever you created is a “deepfake” of me and now you owe me. I’ll just assume you have heard o
by hopelite 1y ago
You are missing the malicious intent. Maybe I simply claim that whatever you created is a “deepfake” of me and now you owe me. I’ll just assume you have heard of parent trolls? Wanted to make a very we will see AI/Deepfake trolls?
You presume both too much and not enough.
- JimDabell 1y ago> Maybe I simply claim that whatever you created is a “deepfake” of me and now you owe me. How are you going to do that unless it actually looks like you?
- j-bos 1y agoGiven a large enough set of generated character there will be many that look like some real person. The cited "you" could refer to any of aesthetic collisions.
- JimDabell 1y agoYes, and what happens when they try to argue that somebody made a deepfake of some random person and they are asked what the motive is? Or when it goes through discovery and it’s plainly obvious deepfakes weren’t used? Courts aren’t gullible automatons.
- j-bos 1y agoYou're right, they're not. But if it plays out anything like copyright enforcement on the web today, distribution platforms will take down more things without a whiff of court intervention.