> Worse in what ways? It doesn't do what it is sold as doing¹ while causing a bit of faf. The restriction is one of those put in place because someone somewhe

> Worse in what ways? It doesn't do what it is sold as doing¹ while causing a bit of faf. The restriction is one of those put in place because someone somewhere want to be seen to be doing something. > for (under normal circumstances) undesirable behavior. Outside of a supply problem situation, which we don't have for that sort of thing and different at the time the change came in, why is it so undesirable? -------- [1] Reducing accidental overdose rates², reducing people using out-dated-so-possibly-ineffective medicines, etc. [2] Accidental overdose rates have fallen, but they have in many places without those restrictions, so I suspect that is a coincidence and probably more due to greater awareness³ of there being paracetamol or aspirin in other products and therefore the need to be careful what you take in combination. [3] Due to better labelling?