2 ms·
This is very interesting. The idea and requirement between ease of use and full-REST implementation is definitely worth discussing. Two Points: * Consistency c
by fideloper 14y ago
This is very interesting. The idea and requirement between ease of use and full-REST implementation is definitely worth discussing.
Two Points:
* Consistency could be very useful across web-services
* Simplicity is exceptionally important
If all API's were created with a 'full-REST implementation', that would comply with the need (Desire?) for consistency, however it would not necessarily be easier.
What might be "hard":
* Some limitations (firewalls, lack of knowledge) on PUT and DELETE
* The debate on when to use PUT and DELETE
* Editing headers to request content type (xml vs json etc)
So the big question seems to be: What is the mix between consistency and ease of use?
Perhaps we can be full-on REST but then make it easier with code libraries?