2 ms·

Three days to implement recent ruling? 2025-04-31, "Judge rules Apple executive lied under oath, makes criminal contempt referral", https://news.ycombinator.co

• doctorpangloss 1y ago
  Go ahead and read the first page of the April 31st, 2025 order that you linked: "For the reasons set forth herein, the Court FINDS Apple in willful violation of this Court’s 2021 Injunction which issued to restrain and prohibit Apple’s anticompetitive conduct and anticompetitive pricing." But this stuff is presented in not the most accessible ways. I tried authoring the tweet-length version. It's up to you, whom to trust or not trust on the Internet!
  • deleted 1y ago
    [deleted]
• Zak 1y ago
  The short version is that they were given a lot of flexibility in how they complied with the previous ruling and a lot of time in which to do it. The judge found their implementation did not comply, so she decided how they were to comply with very little flexibility and a short timetable.