41 ms·
What's wrong with Markdown links [1]? I'd have a hard time coming up with a better syntax than this: [Google][] [google]: http://www.google.com/
by taylorfausak 14y ago
What's wrong with Markdown links [1]? I'd have a hard time coming up with a better syntax than this:
[Google][]
[google]: http://www.google.com/
[Google][1]
[1]: http://www.google.com/
[Google](http://www.google.com)
I'm not sure what you mean about double-spacing either. Line breaks (<br />) are made by adding two spaces to the end of a line. If you don't like that, try GitHub-flavored Markdown [2].
[1]: http://daringfireball.net/projects/markdown/syntax#links http://daringfireball.net/projects/markdown/syntax#links
[2]: http://github.github.com/github-flavored-markdown/ http://github.github.com/github-flavored-markdown/
- JimmyRuska 14y agoI was only aware of the last one. This has the capability to be used as a replacement to html, not just a limited subset. It can also do syntax transformations like the table, which also accepts other syntax transforms and tags. Markdown can't take html attributes either.
- deleted 14y ago[deleted]