2 ms·
to be entirely fair that's quite a high bar even for most "traditional" open source. And even if you had the same data, there's no guarantee the random perturb
by OneDeuxTriSeiGo 1y ago
to be entirely fair that's quite a high bar even for most "traditional" open source.
And even if you had the same data, there's no guarantee the random perturbations during training are driven by a PRNG and done in a way that is reproducible.
Reproducibility does not make something open source. Reproducibility doesn't even necessarily make something free software (under the GNU interpretation). I mean hell, most docker containers aren't even hash-reproducible.