> Being asked if I'm kidding by the person comparing Google glasses to machine learning algorithms is pretty funny ngl. I didn't draw the comparison. Karpathy,

> Being asked if I'm kidding by the person comparing Google glasses to machine learning algorithms is pretty funny ngl. I didn't draw the comparison. Karpathy, one of the most prominent LLM proponents on the planet -- the guy who invented the term 'vibe-coding' -- drew the comparison.[1] > And the "I don't use these tools and never will" sentiment is rampant in the tech community right now. So yes, I am serious. I think you misunderstood my comment -- or my comment just wasn't clear enough: I quoted the line "It does amaze me that the people who don't use these tools seem to have the most to say about them." and then I asked "You're kidding, right?" In other words, "you can't seriously believe that the nay-sayers 'always have the most to say.'" It's a ridiculous claim. Just about every naysayer 'think piece' -- whether or not it's garbage -- is responding to an overwhelming tidal wave of pro-LLM commentary and press coverage. > Youre not talking about the blog post that completely ignored agentless uses are you? The one that came to the conclusion LLMs arent useful despite only using a subset of its features? I'm referring to this one[2]. It's awful, smug, self-important, sanctimonious nonsense. [1] https://www.youtube.com/watch?si=xF5rqWueWDQsW3FC&v=LCEmiRjPEtQ&feature=youtu.be https://www.youtube.com/watch?si=xF5rqWueWDQsW3FC&v=LCEmiRjP... [2] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44294633 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44294633