3 ms·
Lossless JPEG XL encoding is already fast in software and scales very well with the number of cores. With a few cores, it can easily compress 100 megapixels per
by spider-mario 1y ago
Lossless JPEG XL encoding is already fast in software and scales very well with the number of cores. With a few cores, it can easily compress 100 megapixels per second or more. (The times you see in the comment with the DPReview samples are single-threaded and for a total of about 400 MP since each image is 101.8MP.)
- Nanopolygon 1y agoHALIC does almost the same degree of compression tens of times faster. And interestingly, it consumes almost no memory at all. Unfortunately, this is the case.
- spider-mario 1y agoHALIC being faster still doesn’t mean that lossless JXL is so slow as to warrant hardware acceleration.
- Nanopolygon 1y agoYes, I also think that HALIC should be destroyed ;)