4 ms·
No. That is Groklaw's interpretation of what he said. He could have simply meant that by finding Samsung guilty of willful infringement that they were punishing
by taligent 14y ago
No. That is Groklaw's interpretation of what he said. He could have simply meant that by finding Samsung guilty of willful infringement that they were punishing them.
And I don't understand what you're implying by saying that they rushed through the case. Do you think they would have changed their mind or "woken up to the truth" if they were in the room longer ?
- sp332 14y ago"We felt like we were 100 percent fair, but we wanted something more than a slap on the wrist." That's a direct quote. Ars Technica might have taken it out of context, but it looks like the jury was going for a punitive amount instead of damages.
- taligent 14y agoGiven that a number devices were excluded and the maximum damages were not awarded it is clear that they at least evaluated the merits of each specific infringement. So do you have some evidence that they ignored the proper damages awarding process ?
- deleted 14y ago[deleted]
- mistercow 14y ago>So do you have some evidence that they ignored the proper damages awarding process ? Well, there's the part where they awarded damages in at least one instance where they had not actually found infringement.