> you might think it's related, but it's not. In my experience they very much are related. High quality devs are far more likely to output high quality working

> you might think it's related, but it's not. In my experience they very much are related. High quality devs are far more likely to output high quality working code. They test, they validate, they think, ultimately they care. In that case that you are reviewing a patch from someone you have limited experience with, it previously was feasible to infer the quality of the dev from the context of the patch itself and the surrounding context by which it was submitted. LLMs make that judgement far far more difficult and when you can not make a snap judgement you have to revert your review style to very low trust in depth review. No more greasing the wheels to expedite a process.