I agree it's the end-to-end execution that made the iPhone a success. But Samsung had a completely different end-to-end execution, right? I agree with being a

I agree it's the end-to-end execution that made the iPhone a success. But Samsung had a completely different end-to-end execution, right? I agree with being able to sue for a complete copy of end-to-end, or even an attempt to. I just didn't see it in this case, especially with all the prior art. I don't understand the recipe analogy, to me it's like Bush's Beans suing another bean company for the inclusion of cocoa in the recipe. I'm baffled that you feel pinch to zoom should be patentable.