3 ms·
> But it does seem that it isn't written by engineers As far as I can tell, unsurprisingly, the MCP specification was written with the help of LLMs, and seemin
by diggan 1y ago
> But it does seem that it isn't written by engineers
As far as I can tell, unsurprisingly, the MCP specification was written with the help of LLMs, and seemingly hasn't been carefully reviewed because as you say, a bunch of the terms have straight up wrong definitions.
- kreetx 1y agoUsing LLMs is entirely fine, but poor review for a protocol definition is ..degenerate. Aren't protocols supposed to be precise?
- remram 1y agoIt was written by one vendor for their own use. It is miles away from an RFC or "standard"
- diggan 1y agoRegardless if it's a RFC, standard or whatever, protocols need to be precise, exact and correct. And I think they wrote MCP with the idea of others using it, otherwise why even make it public if it's just for their own usage?