4 ms·
7 comments. 3 have obviously only read the title, and 3 comments how the article require JS. Well played HN.
by Kuinox 1y ago
7 comments.
3 have obviously only read the title, and 3 comments how the article require JS.
Well played HN.
- deleted 1y ago[deleted]
- sandspar 1y agoThat's typical for link sharing communities like HN and Reddit. His title clearly struck a nerve. I assume many people opened the link, saw that it was a wall of text, scanned the first paragraph, categorized his point into some slot that they understand, then came here to compete in HN's side-market status game. Normal web browsing behavior, in other words.
- tomhow 1y agoThis exactly why the guideline about titles says: Otherwise please use the original title, unless it is misleading or linkbait. This title counts as linkbait so I've changed it. It turns out the article is much better (for HN) than the title suggests.
- Kuinox 1y agoI did not posted the article, but I know who wrote it. Good change btw.