3 ms·

hence "can be"

• OKRainbowKid 1y ago
  Hence "both".
• nkrisc 1y ago
  We don’t need airbags because injury can be prevented by seatbelts.
  • gosub100 1y ago
    The "don't need" part is a fictitious part you inserted into the argument and not a claim I made. Injury "can be" prevented by seatbelts, that is a valid claim.
    • nkrisc 1y ago
      I don't know what else you could have meant when you answered the question "Why not both" with "one can be prevented by the other". The implied meaning is: "Not both because one can be prevented by the other".
      • gosub100 1y ago
        [flagged]