Certainly with that attitude it is. Joke aside I suspect the flaw in this hypothesis is probably in how AGI is defined and/or constrained: > True AGI—a system

Certainly with that attitude it is. Joke aside I suspect the flaw in this hypothesis is probably in how AGI is defined and/or constrained: > True AGI—a system capable of general intelligence without human input—cannot exist. "without human input"... is an extreme constraint that is unfounded. Human intelligence cannot exist without human input. Children learn from others and it would be impossible to create an adult human mind without the input of thousands, if not millions of humans (via textbooks, and lately the Internet). The easiest way to prove AGI is not possible is to prove that the human mind cannot be simulated in a Turing machine, i.e. there's a quantum factor.