The article claims to prove that "AGI is impossible". Yet the only part even hinting at a definition of what "AGI" means in this context is: > True AGI—a syste

The article claims to prove that "AGI is impossible". Yet the only part even hinting at a definition of what "AGI" means in this context is: > True AGI—a system capable of general intelligence without human input—cannot exist. They don't define "general intelligence" either. There is no generally agreed upon definition of "AGI" so anyone making claims to prove its feasibility or otherwise need to state their priors. Currently nothing is being said here. Also make sure to include a playful example with a blue toy tractor named Tosh in the next version.