3 ms·
That’s not “backwards compatible”, but “round tripable” or “lossless reencode”
by colejohnson66 1y ago
That’s not “backwards compatible”, but “round tripable” or “lossless reencode”
- illiac786 1y agoexactly, it is absolutely not backward compatible. It is lossless-at-bit-level conversion of JPEG, but that doesn’t help older SW in any way.