3 ms·

You're wondering why Americans make the housing decisions they do but then use assumptions which aren't based on the realities Americans live in and berate thos

You're wondering why Americans make the housing decisions they do but then use assumptions which aren't based on the realities Americans live in and berate those who actually try and show your assumptions aren't valid in describing why those Americans are making the choices they make in America. You were wondering: > Yes, but why would anyone want to live on what is effectively a farm, but without the benefit of separation from other people or land (read: income) that a farm offers? > I'm not saying it doesn't exist, I question why people are doing it. I gave lots of data and analysis as to why Americans seem to make this choice. You berated me for giving an actual analysis, gave conjectures not grounded in reality for those people making these choices explaining why my analysis is wrong, and continued to wonder why people would make these choices. Your conjectures weren't valid for the people in question. They weren't based in their reality. But you seem to not want to actually engage in the reality of it. > Colloquially, what we call the place you are looking for is "school". People can learn new things and be corrected on their false preconceptions without necessarily being in a school building with a teacher.

9rx 1y ago
> You're wondering why Americans make the housing decisions they do I wondered what the thoughts about why people make the housing decisions they do were. My country is within America, as it happens, so I suppose if it were to be limited to America that would be all well and good, but it wouldn't have been a detail of any significance. > You berated me for giving an actual analysis I engaged in your analysis to see if I can understand if you were confusing opportunity with number of jobs. I don't think we ever gained that understanding, and eventually we just moved on as it was clear that the only thoughts present were about the concept of data itself, which was well outside of the topic at hand and not producing anything of interest to latch onto. If your thinking sees that as a berating: Fascinating. Can we dive deeper into your thought process there?
- vel0city 1y ago
  I think to most people being called a dog is berating. Saying things like "that's all that your limited thought is able to offer" is berating. > I engaged in your analysis to see if I can understand if you were confusing opportunity with number of jobs It sure seems more like you engaged with the analysis to say I'm wrong about objectively factual things and called me a dog when I provided sources. > I wondered what the thoughts about why people make the housing decisions they do were You're wondering why people make the housing decisions they do but unwilling to actually engage in looking at the actual data of job opportunities, home values, etc. that might actually give you insights into it, from what I can tell. Because, who gives a rat's ass about the data to answer our questions when assumptions and conjectures will do. Obviously, the answer is because these houses in the exurbs are more likely to be tan and people just love the color tan for their home. We don't need to actually look at any information to see if this is true or not, we'll just discuss as if this is truth. Are the houses more likely to be tan? Do people even prefer tan houses? Who cares.
  - 9rx 1y ago
    > Saying things like "that's all that your limited thought is able to offer" is berating. How so? What are you thinking? Additionally, it is interesting that you left out the "if". What was the thought process there? > called me a dog when I provided sources. I likened you to a dog wanting to pointlessly please its master. Call it berating if you will, but that is the behavior I see dogs exhibit and that is the behavior I observed here. I'm sure you have data to contradict my understanding, but to the extent of the understanding I have, that is simply a factual account. > You're wondering why people make the housing decisions they do I asked what others thought about it. > but unwilling to actually engage in looking at the actual data of job opportunities, home values, etc. This wouldn't indicate what others thought about it. There is a place for looking at the data, but that would happen independently and wouldn't carry into a discussion. Different tools for different jobs.
    - vel0city 1y ago
      You don't see how stating someone has limited thought capacity is berating. You don't see how being called a dog is berating. And now you're suggesting I see you as my master, wow. You might want to re-evaluate what people would commonly find berating. Go discuss that with others and see what you find out.
      - 9rx 1y ago
        > You don't see how stating someone has limited thought capacity is berating. No. If someone has limited thought capacity, they have limited thought capacity. That is just a fact of life. For someone so concerned about the veracity of data, how can you see a datapoint as being berating? Granted, the datapoint in this case is only hypothetical (as you would have noticed if you retained the "if"), but such datapoints also do exist in the real data. There absolutely are people in this world with limited thought capacity. That much is not a hypothetical. > You don't see how being called a dog is berating. Likened to a dog. But, no. Why? > You might want to re-evaluate what people would commonly find berating. I'm sure you've got some great data for me to look at, but my understanding is that people find something berating when they understand a statement as some kind of truth that they don't want to admit to themselves. It is quite obvious that nobody feels berated when an assertion is so outlandish that it couldn't be true. That becomes comedy. I have no illusions of being anything related to a dog, so if you likened me to — or even straight up called me — a dog, I would not find that berating, no. If you went after my actual insecurities, then sure. I would then. I am certainly not immune to silly human emotion, but silly human emotion does not get triggered by random strings of text. So, perhaps this is good opportunity to dive into why you feel insecure about your thought capacity and animal shapeliness for these particular strings to activate your emotions. What are your thoughts there? (And my apologies for finding your insecurities. I would have never guessed those particular things would bother anyone. The things you learn from having a discussion!)

9rx 1y ago

> You're wondering why Americans make the housing decisions they do I wondered what the thoughts about why people make the housing decisions they do were. My country is within America, as it happens, so I suppose if it were to be limited to America that would be all well and good, but it wouldn't have been a detail of any significance. > You berated me for giving an actual analysis I engaged in your analysis to see if I can understand if you were confusing opportunity with number of jobs. I don't think we ever gained that understanding, and eventually we just moved on as it was clear that the only thoughts present were about the concept of data itself, which was well outside of the topic at hand and not producing anything of interest to latch onto. If your thinking sees that as a berating: Fascinating. Can we dive deeper into your thought process there?

vel0city 1y ago
I think to most people being called a dog is berating. Saying things like "that's all that your limited thought is able to offer" is berating. > I engaged in your analysis to see if I can understand if you were confusing opportunity with number of jobs It sure seems more like you engaged with the analysis to say I'm wrong about objectively factual things and called me a dog when I provided sources. > I wondered what the thoughts about why people make the housing decisions they do were You're wondering why people make the housing decisions they do but unwilling to actually engage in looking at the actual data of job opportunities, home values, etc. that might actually give you insights into it, from what I can tell. Because, who gives a rat's ass about the data to answer our questions when assumptions and conjectures will do. Obviously, the answer is because these houses in the exurbs are more likely to be tan and people just love the color tan for their home. We don't need to actually look at any information to see if this is true or not, we'll just discuss as if this is truth. Are the houses more likely to be tan? Do people even prefer tan houses? Who cares.
- 9rx 1y ago
  > Saying things like "that's all that your limited thought is able to offer" is berating. How so? What are you thinking? Additionally, it is interesting that you left out the "if". What was the thought process there? > called me a dog when I provided sources. I likened you to a dog wanting to pointlessly please its master. Call it berating if you will, but that is the behavior I see dogs exhibit and that is the behavior I observed here. I'm sure you have data to contradict my understanding, but to the extent of the understanding I have, that is simply a factual account. > You're wondering why people make the housing decisions they do I asked what others thought about it. > but unwilling to actually engage in looking at the actual data of job opportunities, home values, etc. This wouldn't indicate what others thought about it. There is a place for looking at the data, but that would happen independently and wouldn't carry into a discussion. Different tools for different jobs.
  - vel0city 1y ago
    You don't see how stating someone has limited thought capacity is berating. You don't see how being called a dog is berating. And now you're suggesting I see you as my master, wow. You might want to re-evaluate what people would commonly find berating. Go discuss that with others and see what you find out.
    - 9rx 1y ago
      > You don't see how stating someone has limited thought capacity is berating. No. If someone has limited thought capacity, they have limited thought capacity. That is just a fact of life. For someone so concerned about the veracity of data, how can you see a datapoint as being berating? Granted, the datapoint in this case is only hypothetical (as you would have noticed if you retained the "if"), but such datapoints also do exist in the real data. There absolutely are people in this world with limited thought capacity. That much is not a hypothetical. > You don't see how being called a dog is berating. Likened to a dog. But, no. Why? > You might want to re-evaluate what people would commonly find berating. I'm sure you've got some great data for me to look at, but my understanding is that people find something berating when they understand a statement as some kind of truth that they don't want to admit to themselves. It is quite obvious that nobody feels berated when an assertion is so outlandish that it couldn't be true. That becomes comedy. I have no illusions of being anything related to a dog, so if you likened me to — or even straight up called me — a dog, I would not find that berating, no. If you went after my actual insecurities, then sure. I would then. I am certainly not immune to silly human emotion, but silly human emotion does not get triggered by random strings of text. So, perhaps this is good opportunity to dive into why you feel insecure about your thought capacity and animal shapeliness for these particular strings to activate your emotions. What are your thoughts there? (And my apologies for finding your insecurities. I would have never guessed those particular things would bother anyone. The things you learn from having a discussion!)