3 ms·
HALIC discussion page [1] says otherwise. [1] https://encode.su/threads/4025-HALIC-(High-Availability-Lossless-Image-Compression) https://encode.su/threads/402
by thesz 1y ago
HALIC discussion page [1] says otherwise.
[1] https://encode.su/threads/4025-HALIC-(High-Availability-Lossless-Image-Compression) https://encode.su/threads/4025-HALIC-(High-Availability-Loss...
It looks like LEA 0.5 is the champion.
And HALIC is not even close to ten in this [2] lossless image compression benchmark.
[2] https://github.com/WangXuan95/Image-Compression-Benchmark https://github.com/WangXuan95/Image-Compression-Benchmark
- poly2it 1y agoIt looks like HALIC offers very impressive decode speeds within its compression range.
- ksec 1y agoAnd not just decoding speed but also encoding speed with difference of an order of magnitude. Some new results further down in the comments in this thread. Had it not been verified I would have thought it was a scam.
- Nanopolygon 1y agoChampion! I wish you hadn't commented so ignorantly. Please also try to look at the processing speeds! Or you can also try not to comment at all...