3 ms·

I agree and am perfectly happy using it as fuzzier web search, because it works really well for me. Finding references is often my main goal, but other times I

I agree and am perfectly happy using it as fuzzier web search, because it works really well for me. Finding references is often my main goal, but other times I just want some quick facts, in which case I'll be as thorough with checking as I would when reading a random blog with spelling errors.

ngriffiths 1y ago
Actually, someone should design one that can pull in quotes. Like as a separate tool the LLM uses to quote that has guarantees, it's just a copy and can't be hallucinated. Then you could see the primary info when it's needed/asked for, similar to articles
Gormo 1y ago
> I agree and am perfectly happy using it as fuzzier web search, because it works really well for me. Personally, I want the exact opposite: web search to go back to how it was 10-15 years ago, with deterministic search syntax, granular include/exclude syntax, boolean parsing, and absolutely no "did you mean?"s.