4 ms·
I'd rather go for internal self-consistency. For example, if it claims A > B, then it shouldn't claim B > A in a fresh chat for comparisons. In general, you s
by kingstnap 1y ago
I'd rather go for internal self-consistency.
For example, if it claims A > B, then it shouldn't claim B > A in a fresh chat for comparisons.
In general, you shouldn't get A and not A, and you should expect A or Not A.
If it can go from prompt -> result, assuming it's invertible, then result -> prompt should also partially work. An example of this is translation.
The results of some mathematical solutions should go back and solve the original equations. Ex. The derivative of an antiderivative should give you back the original.
- rvnx 1y agoVery cool idea! I am going to try.