4 ms·
I see - thanks.- (That sounds broken. It's basic, useful, harmless information ...)
by Bluestein 1y ago
I see - thanks.-
(That sounds broken. It's basic, useful, harmless information ...)
- johnisgood 1y agoExactly. I remember saying "but it is a publicly available information", that it is in books, etc. and it went on and on about "I understand your frustration, but I cannot give you ...", etc. :D In the end I did manage to get it to answer, however. This was (is) not limited to pharmacology, however.
- Bluestein 1y agoI am interested: What other fields? How did you manage?
- johnisgood 1y agoThankfully there is now searchability, so I would have to search for this particular chat, this was some time ago. I think once it starts to tell you "no", it almost never will turn to "okay, I'll tell you" (maybe only if there were one or two "no"s), so I probably started a new chat, and added how it is for research purposes and whatnot. I do not remember the specifics and I would really have to search for the chat to be able to give you specifics. I may have to search for "sorry" or something. I found something though. I asked it for the interaction between two medications, and it told me "I am sorry you are going through this, but I can't give you information about ...", which I guess is still pharmacology. Edit: I remember another case. It was related to reverse engineering. Edit #2: I found another! I cannot give you specifics, but I asked for it to give me some example sentences for something, and it went on about "consensual relationships" and so forth, even though my partner consented. I told the LLM that she did consent and it went on about that "I'm sorry, but even if she consented, I cannot give you ... because ... and is not healthy ...", and so forth. (Do not think of anything bad here! :P)