22 ms·

I'm very curious to see how this will end up stacking up vs lossless jpegxl

• Simran-B 1y ago
  I doubt it can get anywhere near. What is even the point of a new PNG version if there's something as advanced as JXL that is also royalty-free?
  • layer8 1y ago
    Browser support for JPEG XL is poor (basically only Safari I think), while the new PNG spec is already supported by all mainstream browsers.
    • encom 1y ago
      It's poor, only because Google is using their stranglehold on browsers, to push their own WebP trash. That company can't get broken up soon enough.
      • layer8 1y ago
        Firefox also doesn’t support JPEG XL out of the box, and Chrome does support the new PNG, so ¯\_(ツ)_/¯.
        • trallnag 1y ago
          How about renaming JPEG XL to PNG or just merging the complete spec into PNG 3.0?
        • account42 1y ago
          Firefox is there to prevent/delay the forced breakup of Googles monopoly no to provide any real competition, thanks for showing another example of that.
• LoganDark 1y ago
  For starters, you're actually able to use PNG.