3 ms·

Got it, human suffering is less important than debt

• KoolKat23 1y ago
  That's a reach, actually completely disingenuous. You try help someone based on their CURRENT circumstances, not based on their relationship with someone who died 200 years ago. Completely ridiculous, what about those whose parents were drug addicts, or were kept out of school, or were just purely unlucky to be brought up in and surrounded by poverty. You'll find there are many, more contemporaneous, reasons for suffering and that there are many people suffering that do not have any previously persecuted ancestors. Address their current situation without bias or favouritism.
  • Defletter 1y ago
    > You try help someone based on their CURRENT circumstances You claim I'm being disingenuous and then say this as if I haven't been this entire time referring to historic injustices AND THEIR ONGOING LEGACIES. Nah, y'all just prefer to selectively ignore that part.
    • KoolKat23 1y ago
      I'm saying you can't measure that accurately, it is also extremely biased, what about other injustice? Are those folks less important? You can measure someone's current suffering, resolve that (and it can be done in a much more fair manner).