3 ms·

Low effort, AI generated, catchy title. Perfect recipe for making it to the top of news aggregators.

• gruez 1y ago
  >AI generated What's your basis for this?
  • nohat00 1y ago
    * lots of redundant prose * vaguely incoherent temporal claims * outdated coverage of Southwest * formatting usage of bullet lists and random bolding smells a lot like an O3 "deep research" report * unnamed author
  • meepmorp 1y ago
    “AI” the new “shill”
• sct202 1y ago
  I was thinking it could be AI just from the bullet points bold statement colon structure, but there's a lot of grammatical inconsistencies that I'm not sure an AI would do; for example, the writer's periods and commas are sometimes inside the quotations, sometimes outside, and sometimes both inside and outside.
  • deleted 1y ago
    [deleted]
• jakub_g 1y ago
  Uh, it felt weird indeed reading those super verbose descriptions of what airline X did in year Y and what they changed in year Z, repeated like 5 times in slightly different words. Note: it's a content marketing article on a blog of a company dealing with airline refunds, so it makes sense, you're probably right.