3 ms·
Wasn't that just over an arrangement of someone else's photographs?
by sidewndr46 1y ago
Wasn't that just over an arrangement of someone else's photographs?
- lesuorac 1y agohttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andy_Warhol_Foundation_for_the_Visual_Arts,_Inc._v._Goldsmith https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andy_Warhol_Foundation_for_the... I wouldn't call it that. Goldsmith took a photograph of Prince which Warhol used as a reference to generate an illustration. Vanity Fair then chose to buy a license Warhol's print instead of Goldsmith's photograph. So, despite the artwork being visual transformative (silkscreen vs photograph) the actual use was not transformed.