4 ms·
15 years ago that would've been outrageous. But at this point they're just kicking a dead horse.
by stodor89 1y ago
15 years ago that would've been outrageous. But at this point they're just kicking a dead horse.
- spacecadet 1y agoSurprised/not surprised. When surveillance capitalism is the MO for generations, it just becomes the norm. Personally, I find the world becoming more and more about fighting for survival while simultaneously fuck you I got mine...
- Uvix 1y agoMaybe 25 years ago. But that ship sailed with PATRIOT act and friends post-2001.
- coldtea 1y agoThey got the left cheering to support censorship in the guise of fighting "fake news" when it had the uppper hand, lest someone hurt someone's feelings. Now it will be used againt it, and against in right wing dissidents to the establisment fairy tales too.
- input_sh 1y agoThere's a giant difference between supporting changes to the law that allows further censorship and yelling at companies to be consistent about the enforcement of their own terms of service. One's a law that everyone has to follow, while the other one's a made-up piece of text that the company can change at any point in time if they wish to do so.
- deleted 1y ago[deleted]