3 ms·
> Humans aren't proof that you can't do better than vision, we are proof that the problem can be solved with vision. It's proof that the problem can be solved
by tzs 1y ago
> Humans aren't proof that you can't do better than vision, we are proof that the problem can be solved with vision.
It's proof that the problem can be solved with vision when your driver is a human. That doesn't necessarily prove it for non-human drivers implemented on currently known AI architectures.
Humans can learn from a lot less data then current non-human AIs require. We also learn in the field, often recognizing when we've made a mistake and consciously updating ourselves to handle similar situations better in the future. It is possible that this is necessary to make vision only driving work well.
- smallmancontrov 1y agoYou dodged the question about whether you would choose 40x data or redundant depth maps. I think you dodged the question because you know that 40x data is the clear winner.
- tzs 1y agoI didn't dodge the question. I didn't even consider it enough to form an opinion. I responded to the part of your comment that interested me, which concerned what we can infer from the ability of humans to do vision based driving.
- smallmancontrov 1y agoYou dodged it again lol.