5 ms·
I think it's even simpler. Only Apple had the supply chain to build an affordable device. Everyone else knew the outcome would be too expensive relative to the
by drumdance 14y ago
I think it's even simpler. Only Apple had the supply chain to build an affordable device. Everyone else knew the outcome would be too expensive relative to the feature set.
I love my iPad, but there's no way I would pay $1500 for it. It's just not that good. Only Apple could build one at a competitive cost.
- slantyyz 14y ago>> Only Apple had the supply chain to build an affordable device Don't disagree, but if you flash back to 2007, there was still a huge outcry over the "high" price of the iPhone. People back then had forgotten that they had paid just as much for the first Razr.
- mbreese 14y agoAlso, don't forget that the first iPhone got a $100+ (150?) price break after the first month. They had no idea how popular it was going to be. Not even Apple had appreciated exactly how much the market was waiting for a good touchscreen phone.
- shaggyfrog 14y agoWhat flashback to 2007 would be complete without considering Flash? Remember how the lack of Flash was the biggest strike against the iPhone/iOS platform? How it was a design flaw that would cripple the platform from gaining wide adoption?
- tedunangst 14y agoSamsung obviously is capable of making a device like the iphone and making it affordably, since they are the supply chain. The fact that they make all the parts, but were unable to put them together, says something about Samsung.