3 ms·
If you weren't aware, containers aren't a security boundary. Things like bubblewrap are.
by zamalek 1y ago
If you weren't aware, containers aren't a security boundary. Things like bubblewrap are.
- rlpb 1y agoSemantics make hard assertions about "containers" worthless. It depends on what one means by a container exactly, since Linux has no such concept and our ecosystem doesn't have a strict definition.
- deleted 1y ago[deleted]
- NewJazz 1y agoWhat to you think bubblewrap is, if not a container runtime?
- eyberg 1y agobubblewrap is actually worse - there are known escapes in there that haven't been fixed for years
- quotemstr 1y agoWait. What? What escapes? Is it that bubblewrap not faithfully implement the policy you give it or that there are surprising gaps in the kernel's namespace isolation?
- deleted 1y ago[deleted]
- udev4096 1y agoIt is the most widely used sandbox layer for pretty much everything. What escapes are you talking about? Are we supposed to take your word for it? Come on