4 ms·
If a human brain works why can't AGI? I think the problem with "AGI" is that people don't want "AGI," they want Einstein as their butler. A merely generally in
by AlienRobot 1y ago
If a human brain works why can't AGI?
I think the problem with "AGI" is that people don't want "AGI," they want Einstein as their butler. A merely generally intelligent AI might be only as intelligent as the average human.
- regularfry 1y agoOne problem with the paper is that it defines AGI in such a way that if it fails to solve a problem that is inherently unsolvable, AGI can be written off as impossible. It tries to synthesise a definition from different sources whose own definitions don't have any particular reason to overlap in any meaningful way. I'm just not sure "AGI" is a useful term at this point. It's either something trivially reachable from what we can see today or something totally impossible, depending entirely on the preference of the speaker.
- AlienRobot 1y agoAs far as I'm concerned if it can pass the Turing test it's already AI enough. Not sure what the "G" adds.