4 ms·
It's actually the opposite. Humans, for all their faults, are amazingly safe drivers. Depending on exactly how you choose to measure things, we achieve anywhere
by AlotOfReading 1y ago
It's actually the opposite. Humans, for all their faults, are amazingly safe drivers. Depending on exactly how you choose to measure things, we achieve anywhere from 5-8 9s of reliability or more.
It's statistically unlikely that we'd see an issue like this on the first day of a limited deployment if FSD was hitting those numbers.
- jfoster 1y agoThat's true. As part of this deployment they haven't driven enough miles to prove safety, but from their FSD data overall they should have a pretty good understanding of where they stand.
- ahahahahah 1y ago> from their FSD data overall they should have a pretty good understanding of where they stand They know where they stand when there is a safety driver behind the wheel. I'd expect if that data were really good, they'd be less secretive about it. But still, it says very little about where they stand without that driver.