3 ms·
In your paper it states: AGI as commonly defined However I don’t see where you go on to give a formalization of “AGI” or what the common definition is. can y
by AndrewKemendo 1y ago
In your paper it states:
AGI as commonly defined
However I don’t see where you go on to give a formalization of “AGI” or what the common definition is.
can you do that in a mathematically rigorous way such that it’s a testable hypothesis?
- fc417fc802 1y agoI don't think it exists. We can't even seem to agree on a standard criteria for "intelligence" when assessing humans let alone a rigorous mathematical definition. In turn, my understanding of the commonly accepted definition for AGI (as opposed to AI or ML) has always been "vaguely human or better". Unless the marketing department is involved in which case all bets are off.
- viraptor 1y agoIt can exist for the purpose of the paper. As in "when I write AGI, I mean ...". Otherwise what's the point in any rigour if we're just going by "you know what I mean" vibes.