> There’s also no reason that the public facing name has to be the same as the internal name. They could have called it Windows 9 and internally reported it as

> There’s also no reason that the public facing name has to be the same as the internal name. They could have called it Windows 9 and internally reported it as anything in the apis. This is what they were doing at the time anyway. Windows 7 was 6.1, Windows 8 was 6.2, Windows 8.1 was 6.3.