> it's interesting that your instinctive reaction to a message > you don't agree with is to suppress it. I think you need to explain why not providing a comm

> it's interesting that your instinctive reaction to a message > you don't agree with is to suppress it. I think you need to explain why not providing a communications tool to someone you disagree with is equivalent to actively suppressing that person's free-speech rights, otherwise we might just assume you're just trying to deliberately turn this discussion into name-calling.