3 ms·
Thanks for this link. Between it and the main article, I have a much better sense for how compile time reflection will actually be useful. The syntax is bad eno
by PessimalDecimal 1y ago
Thanks for this link. Between it and the main article, I have a much better sense for how compile time reflection will actually be useful. The syntax is bad enough to make my eyes bleed, but at least they'll bleed for a good reason I hope.
- techjamie 1y ago> The syntax is bad enough to make my eyes bleed That's on brand for C++ in general. It works well, but it's ugly as sin while doing it.
- bestouff 1y agoI don't agree with you. Yes syntax is often awful but no it doesn't work that well. It's a minefield of Undefined Behavior.
- pjmlp 1y agoWhile true, just like everyone on Rust land rarely thinks about configuring their projects without clippy, C and C++ developers should learn static analysers for C and eventually C++ exist since 1979. It doesn't fix everything, yet it fixes more than those that don't use them at all. I have been using such tools since mid-1990's when coding in either C or C++, and sadly it is still a discussion point regarding adoption.
- grg0 1y agoI am happy^^ that ^^ is our quote character. ^^