4 ms·
> "There is no "objective truth" to be found here" Of course there's objective truth here. This is a technical question with an uncontroversial technical answe
by perihelions 1y ago
> "There is no "objective truth" to be found here"
Of course there's objective truth here. This is a technical question with an uncontroversial technical answer (and that quoted physicist told us the answer).
- diggan 1y agoIf > no materials left there that, if targeted, would cause radiation and be harmful to our compatriots is a accurate picture of Iran's intention behind moving the uranium or not, is not something an expert of any sector could say for sure, unless they somehow have insider information. Not sure why you'd believe so.