4 ms·
You’d think the right thing to do would be to pick the option wildlife is most likely to use, and that there was research and decision-making that went into tha
by jmye 1y ago
You’d think the right thing to do would be to pick the option wildlife is most likely to use, and that there was research and decision-making that went into that above and beyond “tons of concrete”.
Do you think that didn’t happen, that you’re significantly smarter about wildlife bridges than the folks who planned this one (who were, apparently, too dumb to ask a question you thought of sixty seconds after reading about the amount of concrete used), or just deeply into throwing shade, deserved or not, at CA at every half-imagined opportunity?
- downvotetruth 1y agoNo, I do think that happened and that the underpass was the more reasonable solution; why Caltrans required due to the bridge’s size and cost to have its completion be reliant on donations from the public.
- jmye 1y ago> and that the underpass was the more reasonable solution […] bridge’s size and cost Emphasis mine. So still just about the amount of concrete. Ok. Good talk.