3 ms·
Change of the Iran regime would help lessening the risk of a prolonged war. From what can be glanced from the news seeping through it seems that the population
by huhtenberg 1y ago
Change of the Iran regime would help lessening the risk of a prolonged war.
From what can be glanced from the news seeping through it seems that the population has been largely ready for it for a while now.
- UmGuys 1y agoWhat is this commentary? We literally just attacked them. We punched them in the face. We're doing the war. Not them.
- huhtenberg 1y agoYou must be trolling. In case you are not - the US attacked their nuclear research facilities. This is as far removed from attacking "them", as Iranian people, as it gets.
- logicchains 1y agoYou're the one who must be trolling. If China bombed American nuclear research facilities, I can't imagine many Americans would agree it's "not an attack on the American people".
- zabzonk 1y agoBecause of course no Iranian people work at those bombed sites.
- karmakurtisaani 1y agoSo if China strategically bombed some US weapons research facilities, that would be just fine and normal?
- UmGuys 1y ago??? WTF are you on. If Iran bombs US research facilities it's okay? I don't understand at all.
- UncleMeat 1y agoIf Al Qaeda had just managed to fly planes into the Pentagon, would we somehow have decided "oh that's not really an attack on us?"
- throwawaynagain 1y agoI think you meant to say: Change of the US regime would help lessening the risk of a prolonged war. From what can be glanced from the news seeping through it seems that the population has been largely ready for it for a while now.
- huhtenberg 1y agoIt's still almost an even split in the US - https://www.natesilver.net/p/trump-approval-ratings-nate-silver-bulletin https://www.natesilver.net/p/trump-approval-ratings-nate-sil...
- UncleMeat 1y agoWe changed the regime in both Afghanistan and Iraq. That worked great at preventing a prolonged war. This "oh the Iranians actually want to be bombed" stuff is absolutely nonsense.