4 ms·
It's not necessary nor sufficient. The logic of argument, does not rely on the emotions of a listener. Eg. Claim1: The motherfucking sun is deff larger than da
by wamatt 14y ago
It's not necessary nor sufficient. The logic of argument, does not rely on the emotions of a listener.
Eg.
Claim1: The motherfucking sun is deff larger than da moonz!
Without getting into petty semantic deconstruction, the essence of the statement is true, regardless of the respect (or lack thereof) for the listener. You seem to be confusing logic, with persuasion and communication.
- lutusp 14y ago> The logic of argument, does not rely on the emotions of a listener. No, only the outcome -- effective communication. > You seem to be confusing logic, with persuasion and communication. You seem to be confused about the purpose of writing -- which is effective communication. Without an awareness of the recipient, writing becomes onanism. BTW apropos the topic, both your sentences above contain an unnecessary comma.