4 ms·
> is also an absurd argument to make. It's not. the world is not a binary system to make simplistic black/white arguments. Nukes certainly act as deterrent for
by seydor 1y ago
> is also an absurd argument to make.
It's not. the world is not a binary system to make simplistic black/white arguments. Nukes certainly act as deterrent for escalating a war. yes , attacks will exist , but we are not escalating with russia for a reason. you are being pedantic , but the argument for deterrence still stands strong.
- motorest 1y ago> It's not. the world is not a binary system to make simplistic black/white arguments. I agree, simplistic comments on the line of "$(country_without_nukes) got attacked because it didn't [had nukes]" are silly and don't pass the smell test. Don't you agree?
- kmijyiyxfbklao 1y agoWell then you should explain how it doesn't make sense. Focusing on how he didn't mention the case where both countries have nuclear weapons is not convincing.