4 ms·
On the one hand, we don't (hello Photoshop!) On the other hand, it looks like the output of a typewriter (including individual variation amongst typed letters
by MikeTheGreat 1y ago
On the one hand, we don't (hello Photoshop!)
On the other hand, it looks like the output of a typewriter (including individual variation amongst typed letters as the typewriter has small variations in the amount of ink that's used for each strike), and if the date on the letter is to be believed (1981) then using a typewriter would have been typical for the time.