3 ms·
I'm not saying that the outcome directly (or even indirectly) affects him materially. It clearly doesn't. I'm saying that, as a patent holder and inventor, his
by reitzensteinm 14y ago
I'm not saying that the outcome directly (or even indirectly) affects him materially. It clearly doesn't.
I'm saying that, as a patent holder and inventor, his perspective is going to be biased towards protecting the rights of innovators, beyond what would be sane from the perspective of the rest of society.
His profession puts him in the same boat as Apple.
- misterbee 14y ago> > Samsung filed counter-claims against Apple too. Samsung also holds patents.
- reitzensteinm 14y agoYou know, I actually didn't miss that bit. It doesn't contradict what I've said. If you disagree, this has already taken up enough space on HN. My email is in my profile and I'd be happy to discuss it.
- kd5bjo 14y agoYou're calling him insane just because he's "a patent holder and inventor"?