4 ms·
So, in the end, your point is not whether the ICC should have the right to put foreign presidents on trial. It's about who has got the strongest military power.
by GTP 1y ago
So, in the end, your point is not whether the ICC should have the right to put foreign presidents on trial. It's about who has got the strongest military power.
- SllX 1y agoMy position is that the ICC should not even exist, but if it is going to exist, then America should safeguard itself and its allies from it. If you look at the real history of the ICC, it’s effectively toothless over any nation that can safeguard its own sovereignty, and otherwise a fig leaf for the supposed lawfulness of foreign intervention into nations that cannot.
- eesmith 1y agoGet rid of the ICC and the exact same sovereignty issues remain with individual national courts.