2 ms·
Impertinent and disingenuous if you pay attention to the timeline; the EO was issued in February. The ICC has changed internal policies, and other members of th
by boston_clone 1y ago
Impertinent and disingenuous if you pay attention to the timeline; the EO was issued in February. The ICC has changed internal policies, and other members of the body sanctioned post-hoc have not had their email accounts suspended. The sexual misconduct allegations surfaced in May.
- dismalaf 1y agoThe sexual assault allegations were reported internally at the ICC last year. Look at this article discussing the allegations, by AP, from last year: https://apnews.com/article/war-crimes-international-criminal-court-sexual-misconduct-metoo-7519d876decb945aafc2215756df19b2 https://apnews.com/article/war-crimes-international-criminal...
- boston_clone 1y agoThank you for providing that context. My follow up question is do you think that had any pertinence towards the issuance of that particular executive order and subsequent suspension of their email account? Or, is it perhaps a persuasive nugget put in there to lend mild credibility to what Trump is doing?